Define the regressionlens decision
State the audience, period, and decision boundary before entering regressionlens evidence.
Free Cursor / GitHub Copilot / Replit / Lovable Comparisons tool
Predicts which existing features are most likely to break after an AI-generated code change.
Your entries remain in this browser session and are not sent to MVPHub.
Your inputs
Use facts from one stated period and keep units consistent. Every required input changes the result or its explanation.
Your calculated result
Planning score
State the audience, period, and decision boundary before entering regressionlens evidence.
Add measurable facts for this method: predicts which existing features are most likely to break after an AI-generated code change.
Use the displayed arithmetic, assumptions, and weakest evidence area to decide what to verify next.
Predicts which existing features are most likely to break after an AI-generated code change. It uses only the evidence and assumptions entered in the form.
Use one recent, representative period and keep every count, duration, cost, or percentage aligned to that same period.
No. It is a planning estimate or decision signal. Validate legal, safety, financial, or technical decisions with an appropriately qualified person.
Recalculate when the scope, evidence, capacity, constraints, prices, dates, or customer segment changes materially.
| Capability | MVPHub | Cursor | GitHub Copilot |
|---|---|---|---|
| Focused calculation from entered evidence | ✓ | — | — |
| Formula and assumptions shown in the result | ✓ | — | — |
| RegressionLens next-step guidance | ✓ | — | — |
MVPHub provides a focused regressionlens calculation and next step. Cursor and GitHub Copilot support broader AI-assisted coding and repository workflows.