No Shared Definition Of "On Time"
Different recruiters and hiring managers held different informal expectations for how quickly a candidate should move through review, scheduling and feedback, with no system enforcing consistency.
Recruitment teams often promise turnaround times for candidate review, interviews, feedback and offers without any system to track whether those promises are kept. We designed and built an MVP that defines hiring service levels and gives recruiters, hiring managers and leadership a live view of where every requisition stands.
Most hiring delays are invisible until a candidate has already gone cold. A resume sits unreviewed, an interview slot goes unbooked, feedback is never submitted, or an offer takes too long to leave the building — and by the time anyone notices, the damage to candidate experience is already done.
This platform gives recruitment teams a shared definition of what "on time" means at each stage of the hiring process, then makes that definition visible to everyone involved — recruiters, hiring managers, and leadership tracking hiring health across the organization.
Different recruiters and hiring managers held different informal expectations for how quickly a candidate should move through review, scheduling and feedback, with no system enforcing consistency.
Stalled requisitions were typically discovered only when a candidate withdrew or a hiring manager escalated, rather than being flagged while there was still time to act.
Without SLA data, leadership had no reliable way to see which stages, teams or roles were consistently running behind across the hiring funnel.
A recruitment SLA platform built around defining, tracking and surfacing turnaround expectations at every stage of hiring.
Recruitment leads set target turnaround times for candidate review, interview scheduling, feedback and offer stages so expectations are explicit rather than assumed.
Recruiters and hiring managers see at a glance which candidates are on track and which are approaching or past their SLA target.
Time-to-schedule is measured from request to booked slot, helping teams spot where coordination is slowing candidates down.
Interviewer feedback deadlines are tracked so a single slow response doesn't stall an otherwise strong candidate.
Once a decision is made, offer preparation and approval time is tracked separately so the final step doesn't undo earlier progress.
Leadership gets a rollup view of turnaround performance by stage, team and role to identify where process changes are actually needed.
We worked through the real hiring stages this platform needed to track, from candidate review through to offer, and where delays typically occur.
We defined how SLA targets, timers and status states would work per stage, keeping the model flexible enough for different roles and teams.
Our engineers built the requisition tracking, stage timers and status views that form the day-to-day recruiter experience.
We tested the SLA logic against realistic hiring scenarios, including overlapping requisitions and multi-stage escalations.
The platform launched as a focused MVP, ready to prove SLA visibility improves turnaround before expanding further.
Visibility is the first fix. You cannot manage a turnaround time nobody can see.
SLA targets are defined per stage rather than hardcoded, so the platform can adapt as hiring processes change.
Requisition status updates as candidates move through stages, keeping the SLA view current without manual refresh.
[CONFIRM FEATURE] Integration with the client's existing applicant tracking or calendar system was not part of the scope confirmed for this MVP.
The MVP's data model and stage logic were structured so additional hiring stages or teams can be added without a rebuild.
× No shared definition of hiring turnaround targets
× Delays discovered only after candidates disengaged
× No visibility into which stage was slowing hiring down
× No consistent way to compare performance across teams
✓ MVP launched defining SLAs across the hiring funnel
✓ Live status view for candidate review, interviews, feedback and offers
✓ Stage-level turnaround tracking in place
✓ Foundation ready for reporting and escalation features
Define the target. Track the stage. Fix what's slow.
Hiring delays are rarely caused by one broken step — they accumulate quietly across review, scheduling, feedback and approval. This MVP gives recruitment teams a shared, visible standard for turnaround time, so slow stages can be identified and improved instead of discovered too late.
“A recruitment process without a visible turnaround standard cannot be improved, only apologized for. Define the target, track the stage, and fix what's actually slow.
”
Bring us your recruitment process, however informal it is today. MVPHUB can help you define the service levels that matter and build the MVP that makes them visible to your whole team.
AI-accelerated. Expert-verified. Built around the outcome your first release needs to prove.