Disputes Handled Ad Hoc Over Email
Support staff resolved disputes case by case over email threads, with no consistent record of what was raised, when, or by whom.
Disputes between buyers and sellers were being handled ad hoc, over email, with no consistent record of what evidence was submitted or why a decision was made. We designed and built an MVP that gives both sides a structured way to raise a case, submit evidence, and reach a documented resolution.
When something goes wrong in a transaction, buyers and sellers need a fair way to be heard and a clear point at which a decision gets made. Handling this over email leaves no consistent record, makes evidence easy to lose track of, and leaves mediators reconstructing context from scattered messages.
This platform brings case filing, evidence submission, mediator review and resolution recording into one connected workflow, giving both parties a transparent process and giving the marketplace operator a defensible, auditable record of how each case was handled.
Support staff resolved disputes case by case over email threads, with no consistent record of what was raised, when, or by whom.
Buyers and sellers sent photos, receipts and explanations as separate attachments, making it hard to line up both sides of the same case.
Once a refund or adjustment was issued, there was no clear, linked record of the evidence and reasoning that led to that outcome.
A structured dispute workflow centered on the needs of buyers and sellers raising a case and mediators reaching a fair, recorded decision.
Either party can open a case against a transaction through a guided flow, so every dispute starts from the same structured record.
Both sides submit their account of events along with text and attached evidence, kept together with the case for easy comparison.
Buyers and sellers can see exactly where a case stands, from opened to under review to resolved, without chasing support for updates.
Mediators see both parties' evidence in one place, letting them assess a case fairly without piecing together separate email threads.
Every decision is captured with its reasoning against the case, giving both parties and the marketplace a clear record of the outcome.
Refunds or transaction adjustments are linked directly to the case that produced them, keeping financial outcomes traceable to their cause.
We mapped how disputes were currently raised, evidenced and resolved, to see where the ad hoc process broke down for buyers, sellers and staff.
We scoped the smallest end-to-end loop that could prove a case could be filed, evidenced and fairly resolved without email back-and-forth.
We designed the filing flow, evidence submission and mediator workspace around clarity for every role in the process.
The engineering team built the core case, evidence and decision workflows and verified them against realistic dispute scenarios.
The MVP launched to real cases, creating a foundation to learn from actual dispute activity before expanding scope further.
A dispute process only earns trust when every case leaves a clear trail. Build the smallest loop that lets both sides be heard and a decision be recorded, then learn from what real cases need.
Every dispute moves through clearly defined states, so buyers, sellers and mediators always know what stage a case is at.
Once submitted, evidence and recorded decisions are preserved against the case, so the history behind an outcome cannot be quietly altered.
Buyers, sellers and mediators each see only the parts of a case relevant to their role, keeping sensitive details appropriately scoped.
Every action on a case is traceable end to end, giving the marketplace a defensible record of how each dispute was actually handled.
× Disputes handled over email and support tickets
× No consistent format for evidence
× Mediators reconstructing context manually
× No linked record behind refund decisions
× Slow, opaque resolution for both parties
✓ Guided case filing for buyer or seller
✓ Consistent, comparable evidence submission
✓ Centralized mediator review workspace
✓ Recorded resolution decisions
✓ Refunds traceable to their case
Raise it once. Evidence it clearly. Resolve it fairly.
The goal was never to automate judgment away from mediators, but to give them the structured record they need to exercise it well. By turning scattered dispute communication into one connected case, the MVP gives buyers, sellers and mediators a clearer, more accountable path to resolution.
“Trust in a marketplace is built or lost in how it handles the moment something goes wrong. Give both sides a fair, recorded way to be heard, and let real cases tell you what the process still needs.
”
Bring us your marketplace or trust-and-safety idea, no matter how early. MVPHUB can help you validate the core dispute workflow and turn it into a professionally verified, market-testable MVP.
AI-accelerated. Expert-verified. Focused on the resolution workflow your first release needs to prove.