Weight capabilities by internal-tool value
Internal tools are judged by speed and safety for repeat use — keyboard shortcuts, bulk actions, undo, and audit logs weigh more heavily than visual polish.
Free internal tool UX audit
AdminUX
Audit an internal tool, back-office panel, or admin dashboard against the patterns that matter for daily, high-frequency internal use — not customer-facing polish.
- Calculated instantly from your inputs
- No signup or data submission
- A focused next step for MVP planning
Your entries remain in this browser session and are not sent to MVPHub.
Your inputs
Describe your internal tool
List one capability per line as Capability | present (yes/no).
Your calculated result
Your result
0/100
Planning score
Recommended next actions
How it works
Scale by daily user count
A missing efficiency capability costs more time in aggregate as more staff rely on the tool every day, so the score scales with your stated user count.
Recommend the highest-leverage fix
Gaps are ranked by combined importance and user count so you know which single change saves the most staff time.
Frequently asked questions
Why does this weigh differently than a customer-facing UX audit?
Internal tools are used repeatedly by trained staff, so speed, safety (undo, audit logs), and information density matter more than first-time discoverability or visual polish.
Do I need an audit log for a small internal tool?
It matters most once multiple staff can edit the same records — the risk of an unexplained change grows with more users, which this tool accounts for via your daily user count.
What if my internal tool serves just one person?
Some gaps (like role-based visibility) matter far less for a single-user tool — the score reflects lower weight at low user counts, though basics like undo still help.
How is this different from a general UX audit?
AdminUX is scoped to internal/back-office tool patterns specifically — a customer-facing UX audit would optimize for very different things like onboarding and marketing clarity.
How we compare
| Capability | MVPHub | Copying a customer-facing UX checklist | A generic admin panel template |
|---|---|---|---|
| Weighted for internal, repeat-use patterns | ✓ | × | — |
| Scales priority by your daily user count | ✓ | × | × |
| Produces a ranked fix list | ✓ | × | × |
| Instant, no design engagement required | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
MVPHub applies internal-tool-specific weighting rather than customer-facing UX criteria that don't fit back-office use. A generic template rarely reflects your actual staff workflow.