State the claim precisely
Separate “changed”, “fixed”, “tested”, and “production ready”—they need different evidence.
AI CHANGE CLAIM CHECK
CodeClaim Verify
Check whether an AI coding assistant’s claim of a fix, test, or production readiness is supported by the repository evidence you can review.
- Uses your inputs in a transparent calculation
- Instant result with practical next steps
- No signup required
Planning guidance only. Validate important decisions with customer evidence and your delivery team.
YOUR INPUTS
Build your result
Complete every field. The result updates only when you choose Calculate.
How it works
Inspect supporting evidence
The calculation weights implementation proof, relevant verification, and scope or regression review.
Accept only what is supported
Use gaps to form a short verification checklist before merging or releasing.
Continue learning: Limits of AI coding tools
Frequently asked questions
Does this inspect my repository?
No. It calculates a review signal from the evidence you enter. You must inspect the repository and run checks yourself.
Does a passing test prove production readiness?
No. A relevant test is one part of the evidence; deployment, security, observability, and operational concerns may still matter.
Can I use this for human-written changes?
Yes. The method checks the claim and evidence, regardless of who made the change.
How We Compare
| Feature | MVPHub | GitHub | Linear |
|---|---|---|---|
| Claim-to-evidence review signal | Included | Limited | Limited |
| Repository hosting and pull requests | Not included | Included | Not included |
| Issue tracking | Not included | Limited | Included |
GitHub hosts code review and Linear tracks work. MVPHub structures a quick evidence check before a claim is accepted.
Related tools
Embed this tool
Add this tool to your site with the canonical iframe below. It remains hosted and maintained by MVPHub.