Score each area on three complexity drivers
Every area is scored by how many roles interact with it, how much conditional logic it contains, and how much data volume it handles — the three factors that most reliably predict UX design difficulty.
Free MVP scoping tool
ComplexityMap
Score each part of your MVP by UX complexity so design effort gets allocated where it is actually needed, not spread evenly across every screen.
- Calculated instantly from your inputs
- No signup or data submission
- A focused next step for MVP planning
Your entries remain in this browser session and are not sent to MVPHub.
Your inputs
Score UX complexity across your MVP
Enter one area per line as Area | roles involved | conditional logic (low/medium/high) | data volume (low/medium/high). List every major area of your MVP.
Your calculated result
Your result
0/100
Planning score
Recommended next actions
How it works
Combine into a single complexity score
The three factors are combined into one comparable complexity score per area, so areas can be ranked against each other consistently.
Rank areas by design-effort priority
The highest-complexity areas are surfaced first, since they deserve the most experienced designer attention and the most iteration time.
Frequently asked questions
Why does role count increase complexity?
Each additional role interacting with an area often means additional permission states, visibility rules, and edge cases to design for.
What counts as "high" conditional logic?
Many branching paths, if/then behavior, or state-dependent UI — a simple linear form is low; a permission-gated multi-step wizard is high.
Should low-complexity areas get no design attention?
No — they still need proper design, just proportionally less iteration and review time than the high-complexity areas at the top of this map.
How is this different from ScreenRank?
ScreenRank prioritizes screens by business importance and validation value; ComplexityMap specifically measures UX design difficulty, which is a different (sometimes conflicting) signal.
How we compare
| Capability | MVPHub | Assuming every screen needs equal design time | A senior designer's informal gut-feel assessment |
|---|---|---|---|
| Scores three specific, transparent complexity drivers | ✓ | × | — |
| Ranks areas consistently for effort allocation | ✓ | × | — |
| Draws on deep pattern-matching experience | × | × | ✓ |
| Instant, no senior designer required | ✓ | ✓ | × |
MVPHub gives a fast, consistent complexity ranking from three transparent factors. A senior designer's gut-feel assessment can catch nuances this formula misses but is not always available or consistent across projects.