List variants from both sides
Each component's variants are listed separately for design and for code, since a component "existing" in both places does not mean every variant matches.
Free MVP design-system tool
Map each design component to its frontend counterpart and see exactly where the two have drifted apart in variants or props.
Your entries remain in this browser session and are not sent to MVPHub.
Your inputs
Enter one component per line as Component name | design variants (semicolon-separated) | code variants (semicolon-separated). List every shared component to check.
Your calculated result
Planning score
Each component's variants are listed separately for design and for code, since a component "existing" in both places does not mean every variant matches.
Variants present in design but missing from code (and vice versa) are identified precisely by name.
Each component gets a sync percentage based on matching variants, rolled up into an overall design-system sync score.
No — you list the variants yourself from both sources. There is no automated scanning of a repository or design file.
Either the variant was designed but never implemented, or it exists in code under a different name — check both possibilities.
Often a developer-added variant that was never formally designed — worth reviewing whether it should be documented or removed.
DesignToken Sync compares individual values like colors and spacing; ComponentSync compares whole components and their variant sets.
| Capability | MVPHub | Manually cross-checking a Figma library against Storybook | A generic design-system audit consultancy |
|---|---|---|---|
| Structured variant-by-variant comparison | ✓ | — | ✓ |
| Per-component and overall sync score | ✓ | × | — |
| Automated repository/Figma scanning | × | × | — |
| No account, paste and get a report instantly | ✓ | ✓ | × |
MVPHub gives an instant structured comparison from data you already have. A consultancy audit can go deeper with actual codebase access but takes far longer and costs more.