Size the codebase shape
Features, domains and integrations determine a transparent structure-complexity score and recommended folder depth.
Free code-structure planner
Project Structure Planner
Plan folders and module boundaries for a new AI-assisted project, with a calculated structure score based on domains, deployment units and team size.
- Calculated instantly from your inputs
- No signup or data submission
- A focused next step for MVP planning
Your entries remain in this browser session and are not sent to MVPHub.
Your inputs
Create boundaries before generating files
The output sizes domain modules and shared code against team and deployment needs, avoiding both a flat folder and premature microservices.
Your calculated result
Your result
0/100
Planning score
Recommended next actions
How it works
Choose boundaries
The generated tree separates application entry points, reusable components, domain features, integrations and tests.
Validate before scaffolding
Review ownership and dependency direction so the proposed folders support the team rather than merely adding layers.
Frequently asked questions
How does the planner choose folder depth?
It increases depth as the number of features, business domains and external integrations grows, within a deliberately small range.
Is the generated tree tied to one framework?
No. The structure is a framework-neutral starting point; rename entry-point and routing folders to match the selected stack.
Should every feature receive its own folder?
Only independently changing product areas need a boundary. Small related screens can remain together until their responsibilities diverge.
How we compare
| Capability | MVPHub | GitHub | Notion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Proposed project tree | ✓ | — | — |
| Complexity-based folder depth | ✓ | — | — |
| Documented boundary prompts | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
MVPHub generates an initial structure from scope and integration counts. GitHub can hold the implemented repository, while Notion can document architecture decisions and ownership.