Choose the learning question
Desirability, usability, feasibility, and viability require different evidence.
PROTOTYPE DECISION GUIDE
Choose the lowest-fidelity prototype that can answer your current product question without building more than the evidence requires.
Planning guidance only. Validate important decisions with customer evidence and your delivery team.
YOUR INPUTS
Complete every field. The result updates only when you choose Calculate.
Desirability, usability, feasibility, and viability require different evidence.
Interaction, technical uncertainty, real data, time, and participants determine the minimum useful fidelity.
The recommendation avoids production work that cannot improve the answer.
Continue learning: Wireframe or clickable prototype? · Proof of concept vs prototype
No. Extra polish can consume time without improving evidence and can make participants less willing to criticise the concept.
Use one when the key unknown is whether a technology, integration, model, or data path can work.
Sometimes, but that should not be assumed. Prototype code optimises for learning speed, not necessarily security or maintainability.
| Feature | MVPHub | Figma | Maze |
|---|---|---|---|
| Prototype-type recommendation | Included | Not included | Not included |
| Learning-question routing | Included | Limited | Limited |
| Time and realism constraints | Included | Limited | Limited |
| Constraint-based next step | Included | Not included | Limited |
Figma creates interactive prototypes; Maze supports product research and prototype testing. MVPHub recommends which kind of prototype to make before you move into either workflow.
Add this tool to your site with the canonical iframe below. It remains hosted and maintained by MVPHub.