Enter comparable inputs
Keep every number on the same scope, period and quality assumption.
Free technical investment tool
Rebuild vs Refactor Cost Comparator
Compare rebuilding and refactoring an MVP using cost, delivery time, disruption, uncertainty and expected useful lifespan assumptions.
- Calculated instantly from your inputs
- No signup or data submission
- A focused next step for MVP planning
Your entries remain in this browser session and are not sent to MVPHub.
Your inputs
Put both technical options on the same cost and lifespan basis
The result applies uncertainty buffers and compares annualized cost rather than favoring the lower headline estimate.
Your calculated result
Your result
0/100
Planning score
Recommended next actions
How it works
Apply the formula
The calculator shows how the main inputs affect the result rather than hiding a benchmark.
Review the decision
Use the output as a planning scenario and validate uncertain inputs before committing.
Frequently asked questions
Is this result a binding quote?
No. It is an indicative planning calculation based only on the assumptions entered.
How should uncertain inputs be handled?
Use a cautious scenario, record the source, and rerun the calculation when stronger evidence is available.
Does this replace professional review?
No. Commercial, technical, accounting, security or legal specialists may need to validate decisions in their area.
How we compare
| Capability | MVPHub | Jira | Notion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Transparent input-based calculation | ✓ | — | — |
| Focused MVP recommendation | ✓ | × | × |
| Ongoing collaborative operations | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
MVPHub compares risk-adjusted annualized scenarios. Jira and Notion can hold the technical evidence, migration work and decision record.