Review AI-generated code for vulnerabilities
Use your own manual review or a scanner/linter to check for hardcoded secrets, missing access control, weak crypto, and similar issues.
VULNERABILITY TALLY SCORE
Security Bench Dev
Enter counts of vulnerability categories you found (via your own review or scanner) in AI-generated code and get a computed security-risk score.
- Uses your inputs in a transparent calculation
- Instant result with practical next steps
- No signup required
Planning guidance only. Validate important decisions with customer evidence and your delivery team.
YOUR INPUTS
Build your result
Complete every field. The result updates only when you choose Calculate.
How it works
Enter counts by severity tier
Critical, high, and medium counts, plus how you found them (manual, automated, or both).
Get a weighted security-risk score
Critical findings weigh most heavily; the score reflects your tally, not an independent scan of your code.
Continue learning: AI coding tools and fake packages · Can you build a SaaS with AI alone?
Frequently asked questions
Does Security Bench Dev scan my actual code for vulnerabilities?
No. Security Bench Dev computes a score from the vulnerability counts you enter, based on your own manual review or scanner results — it does not analyze any pasted code or connect to a scanning service itself. If you want an automated pattern scan of pasted text for actual exposed credentials, use Secret Exposure Checker instead; that tool matches real regex patterns against code you paste, which is a different mechanic than this tally-based scorer.
Why do critical findings weigh so much more than medium ones?
A critical issue like an auth bypass or SQL injection can compromise an entire system; a medium issue like a verbose error message is lower-impact on its own. The 30/15/6-point weighting per severity tier reflects that gap.
Does the review method (manual vs automated) matter?
Yes — combining manual and automated review is treated as more reliable, since each method catches different issue types, so the score for combined review is discounted less harshly relative to single-method findings.
Is a score of 100 a guarantee the code is secure?
No — it only reflects zero findings from the review you performed. No manual or automated review catches every vulnerability. Treat a high score as 'nothing found in this pass,' not a security guarantee.
How We Compare
| Feature | MVPHub | Snyk | OWASP ZAP |
|---|---|---|---|
| Weighted risk scoring from your own findings | Included | Not included | Not included |
| Instant computed score, no signup | Included | Not included | Included |
| Automated static/dependency vulnerability scanning | Not included | Included | Limited |
| CI pipeline integration and alerts | Not included | Included | Included |
Snyk and OWASP ZAP automatically scan code and dependencies or live endpoints for vulnerabilities. Security Bench Dev doesn't scan anything itself — it's a fast way to turn findings you already have, from any source, into a weighted risk score.
Related tools
Embed this tool
Add this tool to your site with the canonical iframe below. It remains hosted and maintained by MVPHub.