Check the base unit
A single spacing scale is the strongest predictor of visual consistency; using it or not is weighted most heavily.
Free MVP design tool
Detect inconsistent padding, margins, alignment, grid usage and visual spacing across your screens.
Your entries remain in this browser session and are not sent to MVPHub.
Your inputs
Answer what you know about how spacing is applied today. Spacing Guard computes a weighted spacing-health score.
Your calculated result
Planning score
A single spacing scale is the strongest predictor of visual consistency; using it or not is weighted most heavily.
The number of distinct spacing values relative to screen count signals how disciplined the scale actually is in practice.
Grid alignment and predictable breakpoint scaling round out the final spacing-health score.
A single number (commonly 4px or 8px) that every margin, padding and gap value is a multiple of, so spacing stays visually rhythmic across the product.
A healthy MVP scale usually has 6–10 values (e.g. 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 32, 48px). Well beyond that suggests values were chosen ad hoc rather than from a scale.
No. There is no file-scanning backend — you answer based on your own review, and Spacing Guard computes the weighted score from your answers.
Standardise on one base unit before addressing alignment or responsive scaling — the other two are much easier once the scale is fixed.
| Capability | MVPHub | Figma | manual QA |
|---|---|---|---|
| Weighted spacing-health score | ✓ | × | — |
| Base-unit discipline check | ✓ | × | — |
| Instant, shareable result | ✓ | — | — |
Figma's inspect panel shows raw pixel values but not a consolidated health score. Manual QA can catch spacing issues but rarely produces a weighted, comparable score across releases. Spacing Guard does both in under a minute.