Log element-by-element comparison
Each named element gets its own match verdict against the approved design, rather than a single subjective "looks about right" judgment.
Free MVP QA tool
BuildMatch
Log the differences between an approved design and the page a developer built from it, and get a scored match report for each element you check.
- Calculated instantly from your inputs
- No signup or data submission
- A focused next step for MVP planning
Your entries remain in this browser session and are not sent to MVPHub.
Your inputs
Compare an implemented page against the approved design
Enter one element per line as Element | matches design (yes/no/close) | notes if not matching. List every element you compared between the design and the built page.
Your calculated result
Your result
0/100
Planning score
Recommended next actions
How it works
Distinguish close calls from real mismatches
A three-way match/close/no scale separates true implementation gaps from small deviations that may not be worth blocking a release over.
Score the overall implementation match
A weighted match score across all elements gives a quick read on how faithfully the build follows the approved design.
Frequently asked questions
Does this automatically compare a live page against a design file?
No — you visually compare and log the result per element. There is no automated screenshot capture or pixel comparison in this tool.
What counts as "close" versus "no"?
"Close" is a small, likely-acceptable deviation (a shade of color, a few pixels of spacing); "no" is a clear, visible mismatch that should be fixed.
Should every mismatch block a release?
Not necessarily — use the report to triage: real functional mismatches should usually be fixed, cosmetic "close" items can often ship and be polished later.
How is this different from PixelAudit?
BuildMatch is a manual, element-by-element log you fill in yourself; PixelAudit is framed as an automated visual QA pass — use whichever fits your team's workflow.
How we compare
| Capability | MVPHub | An informal visual review in a PR comment | Percy or Chromatic visual regression testing |
|---|---|---|---|
| Structured element-by-element match verdicts | ✓ | × | — |
| Distinguishes close calls from real mismatches | ✓ | × | × |
| Automated pixel-diffing screenshots | × | × | ✓ |
| No account, paste and get a report instantly | ✓ | ✓ | × |
MVPHub gives structure to a manual visual comparison you already do. Percy and Chromatic automate pixel-level screenshot diffing, which requires setup and an account.