Check four standard visual dimensions
Every screen is checked against typography, spacing, color, and alignment consistency with its design reference — the four most common sources of visual drift.
Free MVP QA tool
PixelAudit
Run a structured visual QA pass between a staging build and its design reference, checking a standard set of visual dimensions rather than relying on a general "does it look right" glance.
- Calculated instantly from your inputs
- No signup or data submission
- A focused next step for MVP planning
Your entries remain in this browser session and are not sent to MVPHub.
Your inputs
Audit visual consistency between staging and design
Enter one screen per line as Screen | typography ok (yes/no) | spacing ok (yes/no) | colors ok (yes/no) | alignment ok (yes/no). List every screen checked this QA round.
Your calculated result
Your result
0/100
Planning score
Recommended next actions
How it works
Score consistency per screen and overall
Each screen gets a consistency score from its four checks, rolled up into an overall build-level score.
Rank screens by inconsistency
Screens with the most failed checks are surfaced first, so fixes are prioritized by visible impact.
Frequently asked questions
Does PixelAudit take actual screenshots and compare pixels?
No — this is a structured checklist you fill in from your own visual comparison, not an automated pixel-diffing tool.
What if a screen fails on a dimension for a good reason?
Mark it "no" and note why separately — the report flags it for review, it does not automatically judge intent.
How often should I run this?
After each significant deployment or design-system change, before considering the build visually final.
How is this different from BuildMatch?
BuildMatch compares specific named elements one by one; PixelAudit checks four standard visual-consistency dimensions across whole screens as a QA pass.
How we compare
| Capability | MVPHub | An ad-hoc "eyeball it" QA pass | Percy or Chromatic automated visual regression |
|---|---|---|---|
| Structured four-dimension checklist per screen | ✓ | × | — |
| Ranks screens by inconsistency automatically | ✓ | × | × |
| Automated pixel-level screenshot comparison | × | × | ✓ |
| No account, paste and get a report instantly | ✓ | ✓ | × |
MVPHub structures a manual visual QA pass around four consistent dimensions. Percy and Chromatic automate pixel comparison but require setup, an account, and CI integration.