Score each action's real risk
Risk increases when an action is irreversible and/or affects other users beyond the person taking it — these two factors together determine how much friction the confirmation should add.
Free confirmation pattern tool
ConfirmUX
List your product's destructive or high-stakes actions and get a risk-matched confirmation pattern for each — a simple confirm, a typed-confirmation, or a cooling-off period.
- Calculated instantly from your inputs
- No signup or data submission
- A focused next step for MVP planning
Your entries remain in this browser session and are not sent to MVPHub.
Your inputs
List your destructive/high-stakes actions
Enter one action per line as Action | reversible (yes/no) | affects other users (yes/no).
Your calculated result
Your result
0/100
Planning score
Recommended next actions
How it works
Match a confirmation pattern to the risk level
Low-risk reversible actions get a simple one-click confirm; irreversible or multi-user-affecting actions get a typed-confirmation (retype the item name) or an explicit "this cannot be undone" warning.
Flag over- and under-protected actions
A low-risk action buried behind a heavy typed-confirmation adds needless friction; a high-risk action with no more than a simple confirm is flagged as under-protected.
Frequently asked questions
When should I use a typed-confirmation (retype the name)?
Reserve it for irreversible actions that also affect other users or significant data — like deleting a workspace. Using it for routine low-risk deletes adds friction without safety benefit.
Is a simple "Are you sure?" ever enough?
Yes — for reversible, single-user actions (like deleting a draft you can restore), a lightweight one-click confirm avoids unnecessary friction while still catching accidental clicks.
What about a cooling-off period instead of a confirmation?
For account or subscription cancellation, a short "your data stays available for 30 days" delay is often better UX than any confirmation dialog — it reduces anxiety without blocking the action.
How is this different from ModalGuard?
ConfirmUX designs the specific confirmation pattern for one risky action; ModalGuard broadly audits whether your product is overusing modals for non-destructive, routine tasks.
How we compare
| Capability | MVPHub | Using the same "Are you sure?" for every action | A generic destructive-action UI pattern library |
|---|---|---|---|
| Matches confirmation to your action's real risk | ✓ | × | — |
| Flags over- and under-protected actions | ✓ | × | × |
| Covers your specific action list | ✓ | × | × |
| Instant, no design engagement required | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
MVPHub matches confirmation friction to your action's actual reversibility and blast radius. A one-size-fits-all confirmation either under-protects serious actions or over-frustrates users on minor ones.