FLOW-COMPLETENESS OUTLINE

Flow Forge AI

Enter your screens, decision points, and alternate paths and get a structured flow outline assembled from your inputs, plus a flow-completeness score based on branch and failure-path coverage.

  • Uses your inputs in a transparent calculation
  • Instant result with practical next steps
  • No signup required

Planning guidance only. Validate important decisions with customer evidence and your delivery team.

How it works

1

Describe your flow

Enter main screen count, decision points, alternate paths, failure states, plus your entry point and success state.

2

We assemble a structured outline

Your inputs are assembled into a numbered flow outline from entry to success, with branches, alternates, and failure states listed alongside it.

3

Get a flow-completeness score

Decision, alternate-path, and failure-state coverage are each scored against what a flow of this size typically needs, combined into one 0-100 completeness score.

Frequently asked questions

Does Flow Forge AI generate my flow automatically from a description or diagram?

No. Flow Forge AI assembles a structured flow outline and completeness score entirely from the screen, decision, alternate-path, and failure-state counts you enter. It does not parse uploaded diagrams, screenshots, or product designs, and does not run a real AI/LLM generation step.

How is this different from the User Flow Mapper?

User Flow Mapper maps a single, ordered happy-path journey from entry to success and scores its friction. Flow Forge AI is for a more complete flow graph — it expects decision branches, alternate paths, and failure states alongside the main screens, and scores branch and failure-path coverage rather than friction. Use User Flow Mapper for the shortest path a user takes; use Flow Forge AI when you need to account for the branches and failure modes around that path.

What counts as a "decision point"?

Any screen where the user or the system branches — a choice between two actions, a conditional redirect, or an if/else in the underlying logic. It is different from an alternate path, which is a whole secondary route (like "forgot password") rather than a single branching moment.

Why does the expected coverage scale with screen count?

A 3-screen flow realistically needs only one or two decision points and failure states, while a 20-screen flow needs several. The score compares your counts to a simple proportional expectation for a flow of that size, rather than a fixed target.

Can I use this output directly as development-ready documentation?

Treat it as a first-pass outline for a design or product discussion, not a finished specification. Review it with your design and engineering team and validate the riskiest branches with real users before locking it in.

How We Compare

Feature MVPHub WhimsicalFigJam
Flow-completeness score from branch/failure coverage Included Not included Not included
Structured outline assembled from your counts Included Limited Limited
Free-form visual flowchart drawing Not included Included Included
Real-time multiplayer diagramming Not included Included Included

Whimsical and FigJam are general-purpose diagramming canvases where you draw a flowchart by hand. Flow Forge AI does not draw diagrams — it turns a handful of structured inputs into a quick completeness read so you know whether your flow needs more branches or failure states before you invest time drawing it out in a tool like those.

Embed this tool

Add this tool to your site with the canonical iframe below. It remains hosted and maintained by MVPHub.

<iframe src="https://mvphub.tech/tool/flowforge-ai/" title="MVPHub tool" width="100%" height="760" loading="lazy"></iframe>