Describe your flow
Enter main screen count, decision points, alternate paths, failure states, plus your entry point and success state.
FLOW-COMPLETENESS OUTLINE
Enter your screens, decision points, and alternate paths and get a structured flow outline assembled from your inputs, plus a flow-completeness score based on branch and failure-path coverage.
Planning guidance only. Validate important decisions with customer evidence and your delivery team.
YOUR INPUTS
Complete every field. The result updates only when you choose Calculate.
Enter main screen count, decision points, alternate paths, failure states, plus your entry point and success state.
Your inputs are assembled into a numbered flow outline from entry to success, with branches, alternates, and failure states listed alongside it.
Decision, alternate-path, and failure-state coverage are each scored against what a flow of this size typically needs, combined into one 0-100 completeness score.
Continue learning: How many user flows does an MVP need? · User flow vs wireframe: what to build first
No. Flow Forge AI assembles a structured flow outline and completeness score entirely from the screen, decision, alternate-path, and failure-state counts you enter. It does not parse uploaded diagrams, screenshots, or product designs, and does not run a real AI/LLM generation step.
User Flow Mapper maps a single, ordered happy-path journey from entry to success and scores its friction. Flow Forge AI is for a more complete flow graph — it expects decision branches, alternate paths, and failure states alongside the main screens, and scores branch and failure-path coverage rather than friction. Use User Flow Mapper for the shortest path a user takes; use Flow Forge AI when you need to account for the branches and failure modes around that path.
Any screen where the user or the system branches — a choice between two actions, a conditional redirect, or an if/else in the underlying logic. It is different from an alternate path, which is a whole secondary route (like "forgot password") rather than a single branching moment.
A 3-screen flow realistically needs only one or two decision points and failure states, while a 20-screen flow needs several. The score compares your counts to a simple proportional expectation for a flow of that size, rather than a fixed target.
Treat it as a first-pass outline for a design or product discussion, not a finished specification. Review it with your design and engineering team and validate the riskiest branches with real users before locking it in.
| Feature | MVPHub | Whimsical | FigJam |
|---|---|---|---|
| Flow-completeness score from branch/failure coverage | Included | Not included | Not included |
| Structured outline assembled from your counts | Included | Limited | Limited |
| Free-form visual flowchart drawing | Not included | Included | Included |
| Real-time multiplayer diagramming | Not included | Included | Included |
Whimsical and FigJam are general-purpose diagramming canvases where you draw a flowchart by hand. Flow Forge AI does not draw diagrams — it turns a handful of structured inputs into a quick completeness read so you know whether your flow needs more branches or failure states before you invest time drawing it out in a tool like those.
Add this tool to your site with the canonical iframe below. It remains hosted and maintained by MVPHub.