Show each variation to real users
Run the comparison yourself — side by side or sequentially — and ask which they prefer and why, in their own words.
Free MVP A/B design tool
Compare two or more UI variations tested with real users, and get a preference score plus the recurring reasons behind each vote.
Your entries remain in this browser session and are not sent to MVPHub.
Your inputs
Enter one tester vote per line as Tester | variation chosen | reason keyword. Use the same variation names you tested (e.g. A, B, or Version 1).
Your calculated result
Planning score
Run the comparison yourself — side by side or sequentially — and ask which they prefer and why, in their own words.
Each line captures which variation won and a short keyword summarising the reasoning behind that choice.
Votes are tallied per variation and reasons are grouped by keyword frequency, showing not just which design won but why.
No — you present the variations yourself using any method (screenshots, a slide deck, a live prototype) and record the results here.
Any number — list as many distinct variation names as you tested, and the tool tallies votes and reasons for each one.
Pick the strongest one per vote, or log the tester twice with different reason keywords if you want both captured separately.
For a small sample, treat it as a signal, not a verdict — pair it with the reasons given and your own judgment before committing to a redesign.
| Capability | MVPHub | PickFu | A poll link |
|---|---|---|---|
| Preference tally per variation | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Groups and ranks the reasons behind votes | ✓ | — | × |
| Recruits an audience to vote | × | ✓ | — |
| Works with votes from your own testers | ✓ | — | ✓ |
MVPHub tallies and analyses preference votes you collected from your own users. PickFu recruits a paid panel to vote directly on its platform.