Separate opinion from evidence
Each item is tagged as either a stakeholder suggestion or a finding backed by actual user evidence (testing, analytics, interviews).
Free MVP feedback tool
Feedback Conflict
Log stakeholder suggestions alongside actual user evidence and see which contradict each other, so opinions do not quietly override what users actually showed you.
- Calculated instantly from your inputs
- No signup or data submission
- A focused next step for MVP planning
Your entries remain in this browser session and are not sent to MVPHub.
Your inputs
Find contradictions between stakeholder feedback and user evidence
Enter one item per line as Suggestion | source (stakeholder/user-evidence) | confidence 1–5. Include both stakeholder opinions and evidence-backed findings on the same screen or flow.
Your calculated result
Your result
0/100
Planning score
Recommended next actions
How it works
Match items about the same topic
Items sharing significant keywords are grouped, since a stakeholder opinion and a piece of evidence about the same element are what create a conflict.
Flag evidence-opinion mismatches
When a stakeholder suggestion and user evidence in the same group point in different directions, it is flagged with the evidence confidence so you know which signal to trust more.
Frequently asked questions
How does Feedback Conflict decide two items conflict?
It groups items that share meaningful keywords (the same screen element or decision) and flags a conflict when a stakeholder item and a user-evidence item land in the same group — it does not judge intent or tone.
What if I only have stakeholder opinions and no user evidence yet?
The tool will show that no conflicts could be checked and flag which items still need evidence before you can weigh them confidently.
Does higher confidence mean the evidence is automatically right?
No — confidence is your own rating of how strong that evidence is (sample size, directness). Use it as one input into the decision, not an automatic override.
Can I use this for any kind of design decision, not just UI?
Yes — it works for copy, flow, pricing, or any decision where you are comparing stated opinions against observed behavior.
How we compare
| Capability | MVPHub | A shared meeting notes doc | A general-purpose AI assistant |
|---|---|---|---|
| Explicitly separates opinion from evidence | ✓ | × | — |
| Automatically flags matching-topic contradictions | ✓ | × | — |
| Transparent keyword-matching, no black box | ✓ | ✓ | × |
| No account, paste and get a conflict report instantly | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
MVPHub applies one transparent, repeatable matching rule to every batch. A shared notes doc relies on someone remembering to compare items manually, and a general AI assistant may produce different groupings each time you ask.