Map screens to reviewer groups
Every screen or flow needing feedback is matched to who should be commenting on it, since internal, external and stakeholder feedback need different framing.
Free MVP feedback-setup tool
Feedback Pin
Plan how your team should structure contextual, pin-style feedback collection on a prototype — which screens, who reviews, and what counts as resolved.
- Calculated instantly from your inputs
- No signup or data submission
- A focused next step for MVP planning
Your entries remain in this browser session and are not sent to MVPHub.
Your inputs
Design your contextual feedback collection plan
List one screen or flow per line as Screen | reviewer group | expected comment volume (low/medium/high). This maps out where and how feedback should be collected before you set up any tool.
Your calculated result
Your result
0/100
Planning score
Recommended next actions
How it works
Estimate comment load
Expected volume per screen is used to flag which screens will need the most moderation attention once comments start coming in.
Generate a setup checklist
A concrete checklist tells you what to configure before opening feedback — access permissions, resolution criteria, and a review cadence per reviewer group.
Frequently asked questions
Does Feedback Pin host the actual clickable prototype and comments?
No — it produces the plan for how to structure contextual feedback collection; you then set it up in your prototyping tool of choice (Figma, a live page, etc).
Why separate reviewer groups?
External testers usually need simpler framing and no login friction, while internal stakeholders can handle more detailed technical context — treating them the same reduces useful signal.
What counts as "resolved" feedback?
Define this explicitly in your setup — for example, a comment is resolved when the design changes or when a written rationale for not changing it is added.
How many screens should I collect feedback on at once?
Focus on 3–5 screens per round; spreading pin-style feedback across too many screens dilutes attention and slows down triage.
How we compare
| Capability | MVPHub | Figma comments | A feedback form |
|---|---|---|---|
| Plans reviewer groups and comment load per screen | ✓ | × | × |
| Generates a setup checklist before you open feedback | ✓ | × | × |
| Live pin-to-element commenting on the prototype itself | × | ✓ | × |
| No login required for reviewers | ✓ | — | ✓ |
MVPHub plans the structure and setup for contextual feedback collection. Figma comments provide the live pin-to-element commenting once your plan is ready to implement.