List candidate budget lines
You enter the tools, contracts, or labour costs your solution could plausibly replace, with a fit rating and their current annual spend.
Free B2B validation tool
Find which existing budget line, tool, or cost centre your solution could realistically replace, ranked by fit and spend headroom.
Your entries remain in this browser session and are not sent to MVPHub.
Your inputs
Enter one candidate budget line per line as Budget line | cost centre | replacement fit 1-5 | annual spend. Then set your expected annual price.
Your calculated result
Planning score
You enter the tools, contracts, or labour costs your solution could plausibly replace, with a fit rating and their current annual spend.
Viability blends how closely the line matches what you do with whether its current spend already covers your price.
Candidates are ranked so you can lead your pitch with the budget line most likely to fund the purchase without new approval.
Positioning a purchase as a replacement for existing spend is usually far faster to approve than requesting entirely new budget.
Any existing tool, contract, subscription, or even manual labour cost that your solution could functionally replace or reduce.
How closely the existing spend maps to what your solution does — a 5 means it solves nearly the same job, a 1 means the connection is weak.
The tool flags that and recommends preparing an ROI case for incremental budget rather than assuming a swap will be approved.
No — that tool maps the people in the decision. This tool identifies which existing spend could actually fund the purchase.
| Capability | MVPHub | Excel | ChatGPT |
|---|---|---|---|
| Structured fit-versus-spend ranking | ✓ | — | × |
| Instant numeric viability score | ✓ | — | × |
| Full budget and procurement tracking | × | ✓ | × |
| No signup or spreadsheet setup required | ✓ | × | ✓ |
MVPHub instantly ranks the budget lines you list by fit and spend headroom. Excel can replicate the math manually with a custom formula, and ChatGPT can brainstorm candidates but has no built-in structured scoring.