Enter your critical conditions and current coverage
Add the total critical conditions worth monitoring (like low stock or a late PO), how many already have an automated rule, how many are checked manually, and missed events last quarter.
MONITORING-AUTOMATION COVERAGE GAP
SupplyAlert
Enter how many critical stock, PO, and delivery conditions you monitor manually versus have an automated rule for to see your alert-coverage gap.
- Uses your inputs in a transparent calculation
- Instant result with practical next steps
- No signup required
Planning guidance only. Validate important decisions with customer evidence and your delivery team.
YOUR INPUTS
Build your result
Complete every field. The result updates only when you choose Calculate.
How it works
We calculate your alert-coverage gap
The tool works out what share of critical conditions still lack an automated rule, combined with how often something was actually missed or caught late.
Get a coverage-gap score to prioritize automation
The result shows how much of your monitoring should be automated, prioritizing the conditions most linked to past missed events.
Continue learning: MVP development checklist · How an MVP reduces cost and risk
Frequently asked questions
Does SupplyAlert actually create or run alert rules for me?
No. SupplyAlert is not a live no-code alert-rule engine. It computes a coverage-gap score only from the figures you enter — it does not build, run, or trigger any real alerts. See how much of your monitoring should be automated before building or buying a rule engine.
What counts as a "critical condition"?
Any stock, purchase-order, or delivery situation where being slow to notice causes real cost — examples include stock falling below a safety threshold, a PO running late with no backup supplier, or a delivery missing its promised window.
Why do missed events last quarter affect the score?
A high gap combined with actual missed events signals real, demonstrated risk rather than theoretical risk — the score weights both so the result reflects urgency, not just coverage percentage.
What if I don't track missed events precisely?
Use your best estimate from memory or incident notes — even an approximate count meaningfully improves the score's usefulness over ignoring this factor entirely.
Should every critical condition eventually be automated?
Not necessarily — some conditions are rare or low-cost enough that a manual check is fine. Use the gap score to prioritize the highest-impact conditions first rather than aiming for 100% automation everywhere.
How We Compare
| Feature | MVPHub | FourKites | project44 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Instant alert-coverage gap score | Included | Limited | Limited |
| Real no-code alert-rule builder | Not included | Included | Included |
| No signup required to try the calculation | Included | Not included | Not included |
| Live stock/PO/delivery data integration | Not included | Included | Included |
FourKites and project44 offer real alert-rule builders connected to live operational data. MVPHub gives a fast, transparent coverage-gap estimate from figures you already know, with no setup.
Related tools
Embed this tool
Add this tool to your site with the canonical iframe below. It remains hosted and maintained by MVPHub.